Are you both seeing the same lesson?
Teacher and student log their view after each session. The AI spots mismatches you'd never catch on your own.
Updated 12 July 2026
In your last 8 sessions, when t_lesson_clarity was above 8, s_understanding averaged 7.2. But when t_student_engagement dropped below 6, s_confusing_parts were …
Teachers often think a lesson went well because the student seemed engaged, while the student walks away confused but reluctant to say so. This tracker doesn't rely on either person reading the other's mind. By logging separately after every session, you build a dataset that reveals when your sense of clarity, pace, and understanding actually line up—and when they quietly diverge.
6 fields. Done in 2 minutes each after every session.
Fast enough to fit into any routine, specific enough to generate real patterns after 30 days.
Two perspectives. One AI analysis.
Each participant logs independently from their own perspective. AI analyses both datasets together — finding patterns, agreements, and gaps that neither person could see alone.
The educator who plans and leads each session
The learner who attends and experiences each session
After 7 entries each, AI compares both perspectives and surfaces what both parties may not realise — shared patterns, blind spots, and areas of genuine alignment.
Log, build, learn.
Both log after the session
Teacher answers their side, student answers theirs—takes about 2 minutes each, done privately.
The AI builds a dual record
Over a few weeks, you've got matched pairs: what you taught versus what they learned, your pace versus theirs.
Patterns surface that interviews miss
The AI flags when high engagement doesn't match high understanding, or when you think it's clear but confusion is being logged.
Why people stick with it.
4 things Lesson Reflection reveals about you.
- When your sense of pace doesn't match your student's experience
- Which topics create invisible confusion even when engagement looks fine
- Whether confidence and actual understanding are moving in step
- What patterns show up when lessons land clearly versus when they don't
Here's what arrives at 30 days.
Illustrative — your analysis uses your own data.
The AI cross-references your logged lesson clarity and their logged understanding to show when those two numbers drift apart. It looks at whether sessions where you rated student engagement highly actually correlate with them feeling confident, or whether they're logging confusion even when you thought it went well. Over time, you'll see which topics create the widest perception gap, and whether pace mismatches (your 'too slow' versus their 'too fast') show up as a pattern or just a one-off.
“In your last 8 sessions, when t_lesson_clarity was above 8, s_understanding averaged 7.2. But when t_student_engagement …”
People watching their own patterns.
teacher
student
tutor
Common questions
Do both teacher and student need to log every time?
Yes. The AI needs both perspectives to spot the gaps. If only one person logs, you'll just have half the picture.
What if the student feels awkward being honest?
They log privately. You don't see their raw entries in real time—the AI surfaces patterns across sessions, not single answers.
How many sessions before I get useful insights?
Usually around 5–8. The AI needs enough data points to spot whether mismatches are one-offs or recurring.
Can I use this for group lessons or only one-to-one?
It's built for one teacher and one student per tracker. For groups, you'd need separate trackers per student.
What if we disagree on what the topic even was?
That's exactly the kind of disconnect the AI is designed to catch. If t_topic and s_topic don't align, that's a signal worth seeing.
Is this only for formal tutoring or can parents use it?
Anyone teaching and anyone learning. Parent-child, mentor-mentee, tutor-student—if two people are in a learning relationship, it works.
Pair with these trackers.
Log Year 6 SATs revision sessions across Maths, Reading, and GPS so the AI can surface subject imbalances, the GPS blind spot, and revision consistency through the spring term.
Log prep sessions across all CE subjects so the AI can surface which subjects are being neglected, whether non-core subjects like French and Latin are falling behind, and whether prep is balanced against the target school's pass mark.
Track every SSC CGL session across all four Tier 1 sections and Tier 2 subjects so the AI can surface section imbalance, DI practice gaps, current affairs recency, and score trends across this high-volume central government exam.
Free forever · Plus £7.99/mo · Pro £17.99/mo
Both sides of the story.
Two people. One tracker. AI shows what the data reveals about both of you.
Start a collaboration